What are the potential benefits and pitfalls in promoting a new cinema Essay

What are the potential benefits and pitfalls in promoting a smart cinema that places its emphasis on issues of identity and difference - Essay ExampleWhen motion pictures were first devised in the late 19th century, it was viewed as a medium for documentation of historical artefacts, in much the aforementioned(prenominal) way as still photographs were regarded. By the early 20th century the cling to of motion pictures as a form of entertainment and education was firmly established however, it is only in the recent medieval, during the stay of globalization, that the capability of film as a powerful tool for cultural dissemination has been recognized. Academic studies fall in turned to a determination of the effect of film in creating cross-cultural bridges between societies. A recent genre of film has been developed that explored the clashes among cultural influences and the ensuing resistance, assimilation, or adaptation of these elements. What emerges is the depiction of the ontogeny of identity, its definition in contemporary terms, and its preeminence from the status quo. There are both benefits and pitfalls to this impertinent manner of filmmaking, which this paper will explore. It is however important to first describe the nuances of identity and differentiation, that becomes a defining impel in the creation of motion pictures. Issues of identity and difference The driver for the depiction of cultural identity and its differentiation from the other is born by a universal need for public recognition of the distinctiveness of societies. The want to preserve identity in one form or another is in response to the challenges of multiculturalism and the regime of recognition in democratic societies. The cultural context is valued by individuals as among their basic interests, and their remedy to this is universal. The problem resides, however, is in the reconciliation of the conflicting content of the various valued cultures. This implies limits tha t must be pose on political recognition of particular cultures (Amy Gutmann, 1994 3). In Liberal democracies, citizenship cannot be regarded as a worldwide universal identity, for the reasons that (1) people are unique, self-creating, and creative individuals and (2) people are also culture-bearing whose cultures differ depending on their past and present identifications (Amy Gutmann, 1994 7). Citizenship, therefore, is a unifying and equalizing factor in terms of rights it does not, however, erase cultural distinctiveness. The liberal value of diversity should not be associated with the nullification, but rather the expansion and preservation of the cultural, intellectual, and spiritual horizons of all individuals, enriching and exposing us to differing intellectual and cultural perspectives, allowing for growth, exploration and enlightenment (Amy Gutmann, 1994 9) The problem of cultural homogenization and cultural heterogenization is that there exists the indigenization of new c ultural influences as they are constantly introduced into mainstream society (Arjun Appadurai). The new global cultural economy whitethorn no longer be understood in terms of simple models involving centers and peripheries, but instead as a complex, overlapping, disjunctive order. An elementary framework for exploring these disjunctures is suggested by Arjun Appadurai involves five dimensions of global cultural time period (1) ethnoscapes (2) mediascapes (3) technoscapes (4) finanscapes and (5) ideoscapes. Each of these dimensions is a deeply imbued with historical, linguistic, and political context of nation-states, multinationals, diasporic communities (i.e., sharing common national or cultural identity), and other such aggrupations. The five dimensions form the multiple worlds that are constituted by historically laid collective imaginations of persons and groups flung to various parts of the world (Appadurai, 2003). Deterritorialization generally is one of the major phenomena in contemporary times. It results from the potbelly movement of people of similar culture to other