Plato - Soul Essay Example for Free

Plato Soul Essay1. ) True Simmias uses the theory of recollection in his argument against Socrates nearly the soul and it having immortality, or not. He uses an analogy of an performer to represent the body, and the instruments attunement to represent the soul. He makes a stand that if the body of an instrument batch be destroyed, which will then cause the attunement to withal be destroyed, then isnt that saying the same for the relationship of the body and its soul? (72e-80c). 2. ) True in order for the attunement or harmony within an instrument can work perfectly and in tune, the instrument must be put together correctly and in perfect harmonious measure.3. ) False Socrates states that in that location is no greater evil one can stupefy than to despise reasonable discourse, not hate mankind. However, those that do hate reasonable discourse, be objectionable and nonproductive, but by no squiffy the greatest evil. The greatest evil are those who hurt, torture, and destr oy others for their own selfish reasons or for no reason at all, just because they can. Reasonable discourse is the refined and ideal way to resolve differences and problems. (89d-e) ( but first in that respect is a certain experience we must be careful to avoid That we must not move around misologues, as people become misanthropes.There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse. Misology and misanthropy arise in the same way. ) 4. ) False how can some involvement rule everyplace some other thing, if that thing is the making up of the thing thats trying to rule it? For example, I cannot rule over my mother, when my mother is who made me another example, a soul cannot rule over a body, if the body is what makes up the soul. 5. ) False without such things as the good and the bonny creation non-existent, then how can the soul present existed, before we were born, without them?How would we know whether or not if they did, unless the theory of recollectio n of course, was in play?6. ) True without the senses being intact, how can one hear or see accurately to know anything? To light upon anything? Without just those dickens senses being intact, the other senses will also be inaccurate, as well. (65b) 7. ) True he argues that when discussing opposites, that one thing comes from the opposite of another and nowhere else. (70e-72b) 8. ) False you cant know what you know with just your companionship, because how can you have knowledge, if you do not know anything?You pick out experience, along with trial and error, to be able to learn what you are and arent supposed to do. How is it that the first people came to know anything? They werent just born with their knowledge they had to learn what they know that has formed into their present knowledge. (65a) 9. ) True Socrates does accept the fact that maybe good and beautiful do not exist. Thats when, in question 5, he came to the conclusion that even without their existence, does that say that mean our soul does or doesnt still exist before we are born?Do we need such things as good, evil, beautiful, and ugly to have our soul be pre-existent? 10. ) False Socrates has Simmias agreement that philosophers outstrip themselves as much as realistic from bodily pleasures such as food, drink, sex, fancy clothes, etc. Philosophers are only concerned with the comfort of their souls, and want to free the soul as much as possible from relations with the body. Socrates claims that our senses are vague and may deceive us, so the best kind of wisdom comes from basis, when distanced as far as possible from the distractions of the body. (64c-67b).