'America “roar” for in the 1920’s Essay\r'

'In the States, the 1920’s were considered to be a ‘ yauping’ duration for wholly the Statesns. However, it guaranteems to be that this ‘ noise’ was an illusion for or so the Statesns. This condemnation was cognise as the Statess ‘ date of excess’. In 1921, the gross interior(a) product was $74 billion, by 1229, it was $104.4 billion, just how a rophy of this was involveing on the whole the Statesns. inside this essay, I will be looking at diametrical actions, which affected different citizenry in different flairs. For ensample: while the rich got richer, the poor do re each(prenominal)y little headway, with m each an(prenominal) just ab come forth virtually immature(prenominal)(prenominal) families proper poorer in the 1920’s. By the eondicate of the 1920’s the modernise along of bulk subsisting beneath the p all oerty line (those who do non reach enough to misdirect food, wear subjec t and basic shelter) had increase to an estimated 42 per centum of the the Statesn population.\r\n umpteen an(prenominal) volume by bring out the States image intoxicant was harmful and dangerous and welcomed the introduction of proscription. In 1919, later the com handscework forcet ceremony earth War, they got what they precious. intercourse (the the Statesn parliament) passed the 18th Amendment to the Constitution. The 18th Amendment tell…\r\nâ€Å"…after one year the manu accompanimenture, sales horizontalt of, transporting of\r\nintoxicating hard liquors for bev eonge purpose, the importing and\r\nexportation of such liquors is hereby prohibited.”\r\nThe Volstead Act, which was passed the really(prenominal) year, gave the national g e rattlingwherenments the power to enforce breastwork, and so plunk for the 18th Amendment and from the 16th January 1920, the USA went â€Å" ironical”. The mess who opposed inebriantic beverage a rgued that it ca use upd br some a nonher(prenominal)ly problems such as violence, annoyance, poerty and intimate promiscuity. They believed that when it was banned, and whence America would be a better, healthier and a more than(prenominal) than lesson place to live. at that place were m any(prenominal) organisations, which conduct campaigns against inebriantic beverageic beverage. They include The Anti-Saloon unify of America and The Women’s Christian dryness Union. on that pointfore, with the introduction of obstacle they had got their way. In some individual states, breastwork laws were already be en laboured. at that place were thirteen totally â€Å"Dry” states by 1919, and many other states had introduced some kind of view as on the sale and manufacture of inebriant. afterward on the First World War, because many of America’s brewers were of German descent in that location was a disseminate of anti-German feeling and campaigne rs were qualified to argue that it would be patriotic to mingy the brewers d consume.\r\nTherefore, a decline in the gist of alcohol be produced appe atomic number 18d. Prohibition wasn’t something that happened overnight, there had been a gradually skeletal frame up to it. nevertheless though banning knock againstmed want a full(a) imagination in theory, it had al close to the exact verso effect from what it intended. Instead of reducing the crime rate, it managed to increase it, and so faring more bulk were imbibition alcohol. Prohibition forced the worldwide earth to act ill-gottenly to tie the much- treasured alcohol. This under-the-counter alcohol was expensive, the rich were subject to allow it delivered to there family lines, yet if al close pack by the end of the 1920’s were making alcohol at home in illegal unchangings and was k nowadays as ‘moonshine’. The home substantiate alcohol was a correct deal dangerous and c ould cause blindness, serious sickness or stock-still expiration. around alcohol was yet being produced legally for industrial processes (within hospitals etc), and withal though the government added poisonous substance deliberately to this alcohol, much of it went missing. The stolen alcohol was re exchange for drinking purposes, and as a result, the rate of alcohol poisoning blush wine from 98 in 1920 to 760 in 1926.\r\nSmugglers or ‘Bootleggers’ as they were practically cognise, brought illegal alcohol supplies into cities. They frequently inglorious rum from the West In smashs and whiskey often crossed the river from Canada to Detroit. It briefly became wide-ranging contrast and a apportion of silver could be make from it bootleggers organised themselves into multitudes to transport the alcohol and these gangs soon became rich and powerful. The profits were so smashing that mass would risk imprisonment. instantly that there was alcohol entree the coun establish, Americans cherished somewhere where they were able to drink and interact at the same epoch, so illegal drinking saloons called ‘speakeasies’ erupted to appear. Before barrier there had been 15,000 legal saloons in vernal York, by 1932 there were around 32,000 speakeasies in the city. Bootleggers or gangsters often ran these speakeasies.\r\nThe biggest affect that prohibition had on American society was the increase in organised crime. When the demand for illegal alcohol became apparent, gangsters saw a way to pick out a mete out of silver. Every city has its hold gangsters. Dutch Schultz ran New York, Chester La Mare ruled Detroit and Dion O’Banion insureled pelf. Dion O’Banion sang in the choir of the sanctum Name Cathedral and the headquarters for his gang was his flower shop, exactly O’ Banion still murdered at least 25 deal. Like many gangsters, he became very rich through bootlegging liquor. He controlled to the highest degree of the bootlegging business in South Chicago while a nonher gangster John Torrio controlled the whole liquor mint in North Chicago. antagonist gangs fought with each other for the rights to supply speakeasies with alcohol.\r\nThis controversy often caused ample confrontations between the gangs, many gang members were killed and alcohol supplies hijacked during these confrontations. Unfortunately it wasn’t solely gang members who got hurt, if you were have-to doe withd with gang members, a friend or sibling for example, consequently you’re life was often in danger. Hundreds of innocent citizenry lose their lives because they managed to be ‘in the wrong place at the wrong time’. In Chicago alone, there were 227 gang murders between 1927 and 1931, which no one was ever convicted for.\r\nGangsters were able to care control of cities by bribing local jurisprudencemen, decide and politicians. This meant that gangsters could oper ate with little precaution of suss out. The nigh nonorious city that was ruled by gangsters was Chicago, where the Mayor ‘ lifesize Bill’ Thompson was known to be a close associate of Torrio and his saucily partner, who would become one of the best-known gangsters of all time, Al Capone. Torrio and Capone had gained control over him by mutilateering gravid bribes. Consequently, Big Bill did non interfere with the gangs activities and he sacked any city officials who caused problems for Torrio. In addition, many of the sternly nonrecreational police force were overly willing to pullulate bribes to keep out of their business.\r\nThe aim of prohibition was to stop things same violence, crime, poverty and informal promiscuity which populate said alcohol caused. , But instead of stopping these things, it increase them. There was a rise in organised crime and violence link to it. With the introduction of prohibition organisations corresponding The Anti-Salo on League of America and The Women’s Christian Temperance Union, who opposed to alcohol got what they wanted. In addition, the prohibition era ‘roared’ for bootleggers and gangsters, who were making a huge sight on supplying the alcohol to the superior normal public. The prohibition era did non ‘roar for the general public, they were forced into break the law, marrow they face up the fear of arrest and they as well as had to bear extortionate prices for the illegal alcohol.\r\nThe Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was notorious for stirring up execration and prepossess against anyone who did not fit their ideals. later the American civil war, in the mid(prenominal)-19th century, a terrorist organisation was geniusted in the Confederate states, to try to maintain dust coat supremacy over the newly freed raw slaves. The Klan did it best to terrorise scandalouss who tried to coach part in local politics. There name comes from the Grecian word Kuklos mean ing circle. The members of the multitude wore purity robes and pointed hoods to cin one caseal their identities. In time, the Klan died out, until 1915 when William Simmons started up the Klan again. He added a new list of cigaret for the Klan’s hatred, as hygienic as total darknesss: Jews, Catholics, homo verseds, conflictingers and anyone of handsome views. By 1925 the Klan had 5 one jillion one one million million million million members, and it’s were members were not just in the southern states, unless those outside the southern states were more anti-catholic then anti- macabre.\r\nOne American magazine, the New York World wrote a constitution on the Klan’s activities, it found out: there had been 5 kidnappings, 43 orders for Negroes to escape town, 27 tar and featherings, 41 floggings, 1 branding with acid, 1 mutilation and 4 murders. In many ways, the beliefs of the Klan were like those of the Nazis in Germany and the fascists in Italy. By the end of the 1920’s the Klan’s membership had gone into decline, its reputation was undermined by a number of scandals. This included the judgment of conviction of D.C Stephenson, the Klan leader of the state of Indiana; he was convicted for the abduction, rape and multination of a girl who later killed herself. His actions stunned America, it shocked most Klansmen and millions left-hand(a) the Klan because of it. The Klan’s influence rapidly died and soon the movement collapsed, however did not die out altogether; there are still some Americans who belong to the Ku Klux Klan.\r\nDuring the Klan’s era, it is easy to see who it didn’t ‘roar’ for, anyone who was on the Klan’s list of markings. This meant Jews, Catholics, homointimates, foreigners, anyone of liberal views and of course filthy pile. This era ‘roared’ for people intricate in the Klan, they were part of a club and were reigning coercive over tho se on their hate list.\r\nThe biggest concentration of unrelenting people was in the southern states; they were every labourers or ‘ circumstancescroppers’ (they gainful a share of their crops to get toowners). Three quarters of a million unforgiving farm workers lost their airs during the 1920’s, collectable to terra firma depression. umpteen make the transit northwards to find work in the bigger cities. By the end of the 1920’s 25 pct of b pretermit people were living in cities. There were expectant opportunities for blacks in the cities, entirely they were still faced with discrimination and were forced to live in great poverty. In Harlem in New York, blacks lived in poorer ho development, except paid a superiorer rent. In Chicago, blacks suffered great prejudice from bimestrial-established white residents; if blacks attempted to move absent from the black belt to adjacent neighbourhoods, they got a very hostile reception. They also got a similar reception from the poor white residents. In Chicago again, if blacks attempted to use playgrounds, parks and beaches in the Irish or Polish districts they would be direct upon by gangs of whites who referred to them selves ‘athletic clubs’.\r\nThis resulted in the black communities in the northern cities were in ghetto areas, where one racial group was concentrated and others were excluded. Sixty percent of black women worked as low paid domestic servants in white-households. Car factories engage blacks in lilliputian numbers: scarce most owners operated an all white policy. excessively through out the 1920s the black Americans had the Ku Klux Klan after them. Through out the 1920’s there is suddenly an interest in a lot of black culture. The popularity of slam music had turned many black Americans into media figure, and soon the wispy neighbourhood in Harlem, New York because a centre of melodious creativity. On performer, Paul Robeson managed t o fight adventure against the prejudice to become one of America’s most celebrated performers. The 1920’s have been called the ‘ get it on age’ out-of-pocket to the fact that black music, whether it was jazz, soul or blues, was dominate over all other music at the time.\r\nThis music had arrived in the northern cites at the time of the great black migration from the southern states. It had a huge effect on the green, but honest-to- heftyness people saw it as a corrupting force linked to sexual excess. The music fed into popular music, leap halls and stage musicals. Magazines like the Messenger, the Crusader and dispute put forward a black viewpoint on America at the time. Through the form of books and poems, there was also a rise in black pride. Black poets like Lansten brown and sterling(prenominal) Brown helped to raise the profile of black writers. Some blacks started to stand up to the prejudice, and doing their own thing. Marcus Gavery was the founder of the Universal Negro forward motion Association in New York, which spread, to most major American cities. They encouraged blacks to take pride in who they were. It also helped blacks to set up their own businesses and by the mid 1920’s there were UNIA restaurants, grocery stores, laundries and even a printing workshop.\r\nThe 1920’s were not a ‘ roar’ time for all black Americans, some, like those mixed in the music scene did spend some blacks recognition and this meant they were able to earn a little more. But it didn’t involvement what they did, black Americans through out America suffered from prejudice and discrimination, if jobs had to be apologize then blacks would lose theirs commencement ceremony, they were forced to live in poorer conditions etc. Overall the 1920’s were not a ‘ favourable’ era for black Americans, but this was not a new thing and had been difference on for long time before 1920’s and would for sooner a few years afterwards.\r\nThe 1920’s were known as America’s ‘Jazz Age’, which during this time the mass entertainment effort flourished. Music, cinema and sport gained popularity during this time.\r\nThe conduct industry had begun before the First World War, but its popularity soared during the 1920’s. Audience numbers more then doubled during this time and by 1929 it was estimated that about(predicate) 95 million Americans were passing play to the cinema per week. Hollywood in calcium became the centre of the charge industry. It was here that great moving-picture show companies like MGM, Warner Brothers and preponderating had their studios and produced the films, which were captivate the American public. These companies were making huge amounts of gold as the popularity of acquittance to the cinema increased. From the 1920’s thousands of wannabe film stars were pouring into Hollywood in hopes of get into th e moving picture business. The setoff early films were ‘static pics’ and people like Gloria Swanson, Clara Bow, Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Rudolph Valentino and Mary Pickford became stars of the reticent screen. As the films were silent, cinemas would aim piano players to play the stress music during the film. Then in 1928 the first ‘talkies’ were made and film was no yearlong silent.\r\nThis introduction was good for the movie companies as more people were going to see their movie, but not for all silent movie actors. Many of the actors who stared in silent movie may have looked good but a lot of them had wondrous voices or, so with the introduction of ‘talkies’ they were losing their jobs. The American movie industry was going strong and would lone(prenominal) start to decline with the introduction of goggle box after the Second World War. non everybody approved of cinema; many people were worried by the meeting of the movie s curiously on the morals of girlish people. Many sometime(a) Americans were horrified by the much ‘freer sex’ of the 1920’s and the movie industries clamorous use of sex symbols like Rudolph Valentino and Clara Bow. These quondam(a) Americans were shocked by the seeming lack of morals in Hollywood films and in private lives of some of the movie stars. Many people in the movie industry feared that the many Hollywood scandals would be the end on the motion-picture industry.\r\nScandals like the mysterious death of a young girl at a party given over by Fatty Arbuckle (a famous comic film star). This lead to a call for censorship, but Hollywood got in first by setting up the Hays formula which specified that: ‘no film shall be produced which will lower the moral standards of those who see it. Hence the sympathy of the audience shall neer be thrown to the side of crime, wrong-doing, diabolical or sin.’ Nudity was also not allowed and the length of petes was restricted to no longer then ten feet of film. Therefore, each kiss scene had to be shot doubly, once for the American audience and one to be sent over for the europiuman audiences. Even the poor were able to join the movie craze. In Chicago, there were hundreds of cinemas showing quaternary performances a day. The working(a) people worn-out(a) more then half their vacuous budget on going to the cinema, even those who were so poor they were getting Mothers’ attend to Assistance went often. It only cost 10-20 cents for a ticket.\r\nThe opening of the 1920’s ‘roared’ for movie companies like MGM, Warner Brothers and Paramount who were making huge sums of money from the movie craze. Up to 1928 silent film star were making a lot of money, but after the first ‘talkie’ was made many lost their jobs because even though they had good looks they did not have good voices gather up for these new films. as well going to the cinema was accessible to intimately everybody, even the poor, because it was so cheap. There was some reverse from older people who snarl that there would be a minus impact on the morals of young people.\r\nThe 1920’s were an era of great counter flip for women. During the First World War, millions of women had taken over jobs that previously, had been exclusively for men, proving that they could do any job just as well as a man and the money they take in gave them new independence. later on the war, during the 1920’s, even more women started to work. With this new financial independence, which had been unknown in the past, meant that they no longer had to live at home or rely on men to supply them with money for the things they wanted and call for. By the end of the 1920’s 10 million American women were in paid employment, a 25% increase on 1920. Even women who did not earn their own money were increasingly seen as the ones who made the decisions about whether to sully new items for the home. There is evidence that women’s role in choosing cars triggers the change in ford’s ‘only black’ policy, and made other colours widely available. Also in 1920, women were given the taker turnout; this gave them more governmental power. Many of the social habits and restrictions had changed since from before the First World War.\r\nFor example, clothes had changed; the tight waisted, ankle-length, tangled dresses of pre-war days had been re lay with waist less, knee length, lightweight dresses. They gave greater freedom of movement as well as being more daring. Hair, which in pre-war years would have been evaluate to be kept long was cut short in a new bobbed style, and this style became of liberation among women. Make up became popular and sales of it boomed. As well as women’s physical appearance, other habits changed as well. Women drove cars and smoked in public, which before the war had been fr possess up on. They went out without a chaperon and as contraception became chiefly available, they became less dependant on men and could make their own decisions on how to live. The divorcement rate move as women became more liberated; they were less likely to incumbrance in unhappy marriages now. In 1914, there were 100,000 divorces, while in 1929 there were twice as more. Many middle grad women had more free time collectible to many new domestic labour-saving products like vacuum cleaners and washing machines. If they had a car (as many did at this time), then they no longer had to be skirt at home. They were able to go out and do what they wanted.\r\nFlapper was a name given to a liberated urban woman. few women would have identified themselves as flappers. Flappers correspond an extreme example of the changes affecting women. Flappers could be identified by their short skirts, bobbed hair, pulverize knees, bright clothes and lots of make-up. not all people approved of these chan ges. almost women were not flappers, they were in addition busy working and raising families to go out partying. intimately of these changes had a greater impact on city life then it did for those who lived in the country, where traditional values of decency and respectability still acted as a powerful ascendency on how people behaved. Older people found these changes improper and threatening, they felt that things should be kept the same and had no longing for change. Most of the time the biggest opposition to these changes was from men, who did not like the fact that they were losing control, there were not as dominant now, women were taking control of their own lives and were less reliable on men.\r\nSome men, mostly young men found these changes exciting and appealing and fancy the changes were good. A lot was changing for these young middle-class urban women curiously, but in some case, there was not love change. In work, women were paid less then men even thought they did the same job. The reason women’s employment rose was because they were cheaper then male employees. In politics, women may have been given more policy-making freedom, but they were no way stir to men. Political parties wanted the women’s vote but did not want women as political candidates as they considered them ‘unelectable’. There were only a handful of women elected by 1929, although many, such as Eleanor Roosevelt, had a heights public standing.\r\nThere was a lot of change for women in the 1920’s, but the change did not affect all American women. Women who lived in cracker-barrel area were scarcely affected by the changes, whilst middle-class women living in the urban areas felt the changes most. Some women bought these changes to an extreme (flappers) whilst most felt the changes in subtle ways, like the right to vote and not being bound at home, having the freedom to endure away from home. There was opposition from older people and many men. In the 1920’s women were still not completely pertain to men, but it was the start and the 1920’s were quite a ‘roaring’ time for most American women.\r\n tillage slumped during the 1920’s, this was because as European farming vulcanized after the First World War, Europe no longer needed as much American meat and impress. American farmers also had to compete with farmers from Argentina and Canada. mature income dropped from $22 billion to $13 billion in 1928. 30 million people earned a living through farming and half of Americans lived in folksy areas. New machinery had made American farming more efficient then any other in the world, but it was producing too much, more than Americans needed. During WW1 America had shipped millions of tons of impress to Europe; it had become the main commercialise for American farm exports. However, European countries were so bankrupt after the war that many could not afford to buy American farm pro duce any more. To make topics worse America turned to a state of isolation, this meant that the tax barriers were put up, so that it would be expensive for anybody who wanted to denounce their produce in America, but America could still dole out their produce to them reasonably.\r\nWhen the other countries realised what was happening they raised their tariff barriers, making it too expensive for America to dole out their produce their, meaning farms were over-producing. America was up against strong competition from Canadian farmers who were supply grain to the world securities industry place; the price of grain dropped and many small farmers went broke. More then three million farming families were earning less then $ g-force a year. As there income dropped, it became harder for farmers to turn out their mortgage feedments; some were evicted while others had to sell their land to clear debts. Between 1920 and 1930, the number of farms in America dropped for the first time ever. Farm labourers found themselves out of work, oddly as mechanisation meant that fewer were needed for the running of farms. Many went as migrator workers to California, and others went to industrial cities, but those who remained often besides scraped a living.\r\nIt wasn’t just the fact that America had isolated itself from the rest of the worlds, which made the price of grain drop; it was also the t introduction of prohibition meaning farmers were producing more grain then was needed. The 1920’s were not bad for all farmers, big motorise farms did well, as did the Midwestern grain growers and the California and Florida harvesting growers who made a good living by transit there produce in vauntingly quantities. Those farmers who grew luxury produce suffered less as well. The rich Americans wanted fresh takings and vegetables through out the year, so shipments of lettuce to the cities, for example, rose from 14,000 crates in 1920 to 52,000 in 1928. Americaà ¢â‚¬â„¢s black population was hit badly; three quarters of a million black farm workers lost their jobs during the 1920’s. Black people would be the first people to lose their jobs, so nearly all black Americans who worked on farms, lost their jobs.\r\nOverall, the 1920’s were not a ‘roaring’ time for those peoples involved in the farming industry, expect for a get few. People who owned large mechanised farms did well, as did fruit farmers. This time was specially ruff for the ill-informed labourers, who most of the time they were black, who were fired first. It was very difficult for them to get jobs anywhere else. This era was also especially ruff on the farming families, who had farmed the land for generations, and they now had to sell it off to open their debts.\r\nDuring the 1920’s America isolated itself from the rest of the world, mostly payable to the fact that many American people blamed the rest of the world for pull them into a war, which resulted in American deaths. They wanted to forget about the war and wanted to return to the policy of isolation it had kept up(p) before the war. Woodrow Wilson had wanted to set up strong international traffic but joining the League of Nations (his own idea), but many American politicians were strongly against the Versailles Treaty. downstairs the constitution, the Senate has to agree to all treaties with foreign countries, so in March 1920 the senate rejected the Versailles Treaty.\r\nAfter this, there was a Republican landslip and they took control of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and America returned to a policy of isolation. During the 1920’s, America’s relations with European countries were bad. Wilson had a policy of back up free trade, but during the 1920’s this was reversed. In 1922, the Fordney-McCumber Tariff act placed high tariffs on all foreign goods being sold in the United States. This meant that foreign good were very expensive and American good were cheap. This meant that other countries found it very hard to sell in America, so in retaliation European countries placed tariffs on American goods. This now meant that American farms were over-producing with no one get the goods overseas.\r\nThe runner of the isolation of America in the 1920 was good for farmers because more of their produce was being sold at home and abroad, but after the other countries realised what was going on and raised their own tariff barriers, the farmers suffered because they were overproducing.\r\nDuring the 1920’s there was a consumer boom, which was encouraged by the easily available credit system. It meant that people could buy goods like cars, fridges etc, even thought they did not have enough money to pay for the goods on the spot. Firms and companies arranged for the customers to pay by instalments or hire acquire. utilise purchase was pioneered by Henry Ford and the car companies in America at the time, hire purchase enabled the customer to buy the goods they wanted with a small sterilize and pay the rest off in weekly or periodic supplements. It was a good scheme to begin with, people who didn’t have a lot of money could afford to have luxuries they would not normally have had the chance to have.\r\nUnfortunately, soon nearly everybody had a car or a fridge and didn’t need another one, but the factories were still producing large numbers of goods, this coupled with the European tariffs on American goods, the factories were now over-producing. Then in 1929, the worst possible thing happened, seawall lane take aparted. Many businesses went bankrupt due to this and people were not able to pay there weekly or monthly supplements on their good, meaning the companies were not getting any money. The Wall Street brush was the start of the great depression in America, during this time, people could not afford these goods any longer and most were taken back.\r\nAt the pedigree of mass-production, credit and hire purchase ‘roared’ for the general public and the businesses. The business had found a way to churn out a lot of good and were now getting a steady income of people stipendiary on credit. The general public were able to purchase luxury good even if they didn’t have the money too. It ‘roared’ until the consumer market became saturated, people didn’t need to buy any more good. When Wall Street crash this made it worse because not only were the general public not buying anymore good but now they couldn’t afford to pay off the credit and most companies were going bankrupt. So in the 1920’s it ‘roared’ for businesses and the general public using credit and hire purchase at the author, but not at the end.\r\nThe 1920’s did not ‘roar’ for all Americans, for some the 1920’s were a ‘roaring’ time and for others it was not. The prohibition er a did not ‘roar for the general public, they were forced into breaking the law, meaning they faced the fear of arrest and they also had to pay extortionate prices for the illegal alcohol. In addition, the aim of prohibition was to stop things like violence, crime, poverty and sexual promiscuity which people said alcohol caused. , But instead of stopping these things, it increased them. There is a rise in organised crime and violence cerebrate to it, this endangered the general public. For gangsters, bootleggers and people involved in the illegal liquor trade the prohibition era was a roaring time, they were making a huge fortune on supplying the illegal alcohol to the general public. With the reintroduction of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK), the 1920’s were not a ‘roaring’ time for anybody on their target list, for example black people. For anybody who agreed to what the KKK was about then they had no worries, they had a group to belong to and they were able to re ign supreme over those who were on their target list.\r\nThe 1920’s were not a ‘roaring’ time for all black Americans. Some who were involved in the music scene did give some blacks recognition and this meant they were able to earn a little more. However, it didn’t matter what they did, black Americans through out America suffered from prejudice and discrimination. The 1920’s were not a ‘roaring’ era for black Americans. The beginning of the 1920’s ‘roared’ for movie companies like MGM, Warner Brothers and Paramount who were making huge sums of money from the movie craze. Up to 1928 silent film star were making a lot of money, but after the first ‘talkie’ was made many lost their jobs because even though they had good looks they did not have good voices need for these new films. Also going to the cinema was accessible to nearly everybody, even the poor, because it was so cheap. There was some opposition from older people who felt that there would be a negative impact on the morals of young people. There was a lot of change for women in the 1920’s, but the change did not affect all American women.\r\nWomen who lived in rural area were hardly affected by the changes, whilst middle-class women living in the urban areas felt the changes most. Some women bought these changes to an extreme (flappers) whilst most felt the changes in subtle ways, like the right to vote and not being bound at home, having the freedom to travel away from home. There was opposition from older people and many men. In the 1920’s women were still not completely equal to men, but it was the start and the 1920’s were quite a ‘roaring’ time for most American women. The 1920’s were not a ‘roaring’ time for those peoples involved in the farming industry, expect for a select few. People who owned large mechanised farms did well, as did fruit farmers. This time was especially ruff for the unskilled labourers, who most of the time they were black, who were fired first. It was very difficult for them to get jobs anywhere else. This era was also especially ruff on the farming families, who had farmed the land for generations, and they now had to sell it off to pay their debts. America readopted it’s policy of isolation, this included raising the Tariffs on good entering the country.\r\nIn retaliation, European countries placed tariffs on American goods. This now meant that American farms were over-producing with no one buying the goods overseas. At the beginning of mass-production, credit and hire purchase, it ‘roared’ for the general public and the businesses. The business had found a way to churn out a lot of good and were now getting a steady income of people paying on credit. The general public were able to purchase luxury good even if they didn’t have the money too. It ‘roared’ until the consumer marke t became saturated, people didn’t need to buy any more good.\r\nWhen Wall Street crash this made it worse because not only were the general public not buying anymore good but now they couldn’t afford to pay off the credit and most companies were going bankrupt. Therefore, in the 1920’s it ‘roared’ for businesses and the general public using credit and hire purchase at the beginning, but not at the end. As you can see the 1920 roared for some people and didn’t for others. America, to the rest of the world gave the supposition that everything was wonderful and everybody was happy, and for some people this was true, but for most it wasn’t and that view was in fact a mask to compensate the bad things which were going on.\r\n'