Running Head : AYER AND WITTGENSTEINAyer and WittgensteinAssessing A . J . Ayer s Criticisms of Wittgenstein s Rejection of the Private speech ArgumentByMACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Names of Author (s )]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Course Identification information here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Professors progress to here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Submission date here]Ayer and Wittgenstein : Assessing A . J . Ayer s Criticismsof Wittgenstein s Rejection of the Private mouth actors line ArgumentIn an expression written by A . J . Ayer , he contends that Ludwig Wittgenstein s claim in the Philosophical Investigations that there gutternot be a nonpublic nomenclature is mistaken . At the barrage of the article Ayer wrote : In a quite ordinary soul , it is perspicuous that there can be one-on-one languages . in that res pect can be , because there are (1985 ,.
453This philosophical s job is to wait on the foreland : Does Ayer misunderstand the composition of a secret language Clearly the way by which this question may be properly and adequately answered is by considering (1 ) What Wittgenstein meant by a private language and what his arguments are so as to see why he rejects the possibility of a private language and (2 ) What Ayer meant by a private language and what his arguments are so as to see why he contends that the idea of a private language is not only achievable but also that there are , indeed , languages that ma y be called privateThe philosophical problem! of a private language , as Wittgenstein sees it , save like most philosophical problems , stems...If you postulate to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment